
New Episode
Active or Passive: The Recruiter Line That Decides Who Survives AI
with Amit Parmar, Co-Founder & CEO, Cliquify
About This Episode
Somewhere around minute thirty-seven of this episode, Amit Parmar describes the best recruiter he ever managed: a guy who refused to look at the applicants. He would take the req, go out into the world, find the right person, and disposition the inbound pile afterward. As a TA leader running dashboards, Amit hated it. Looking back, he thinks that recruiter was the only one doing the actual job. That is where this conversation lands, and almost none of it is where it started.
Amit is the co-founder and CEO of Cliquify, an employer brand storytelling platform used by global enterprises, and he spent eighteen years in the seats before that, starting in HR transformation at IBM. He came on to talk about what storytelling actually means for recruiters, and his definition is refreshingly small: stop rewriting the job description and go ask the hiring manager what kind of leader they are, because that is the only thing the candidate actually wants to know. Desiree's immediate response is the funniest and most damning moment in the episode. She is not sure most hiring managers could answer it.
Ashley then flips the whole premise, arguing the storytelling that matters most is not recruiter to candidate at all. It is recruiter to hiring manager, and she walks through a candidate she pushed forward that week who failed a technical screen, circled back on their own to fix it, and just got called the best performer that manager has seen on a role that sat open for two and a half years. An AI screen would have ended that story at the failed question.
From there it gets loose, and better. Amit describes an industry approaching bots talking to bots, applicants gaming systems at a scale nobody has seen, ATSs stacking filters on filters. Desiree calls out clients who cannot get headcount approved but can get five new tools approved, and names the actual failure: nobody diagnosed the original problem before buying the solution. Ashley coins the Competitive Plateau, the point where a high-volume worker has cycled through every competitor in their market and stops choosing jobs on fifty cents an hour, and then says out loud that products profit off recruiter dysfunction, forgetting for one glorious second that she is saying it to a product CEO. He takes it well, because he agrees.
Amit's counter is that the order everyone uses is wrong: it is not people, process, tech. It is strategy, then process, then the people who fit that process, then tech as an enabler. And underneath all of it, the reason we keep buying shiny things, is that humans innovate because we are lazy, and a recruiter with fifty open reqs does not have time for strategy. Stay for the last ten minutes, where Amit opens up Cleo, the tool Cliquify uses to tell a recruiter in Budapest exactly which four companies are taking their data scientists, and Ashley delivers a history lesson on how your job posting ended up on Indeed without anyone ever posting it there.
In this episode:
- What storytelling actually means, stripped of the buzzword, and the one question to ask a hiring manager that changes a job post
- Why the storytelling that moves the needle most is recruiter to hiring manager, not recruiter to candidate
- Ashley's real example of a candidate who failed the screen and became the best hire on a two-and-a-half-year-old req
- What the Edelman trust data actually says, and why "people trust their employer" is a ranking, not a win
- The Competitive Plateau: what happens when a high-volume worker has already worked for every competitor in town
- Bots talking to bots, and the ATS filter stack built to clean up a mess we created
- Why companies can get five tools approved but not one more recruiter
- Strategy, process, people, tech — and why everyone runs that order backward
- Humans innovate because we are lazy, and what that means for every product purchase in TA
- Why products sell you symptom relief, and how root cause analysis always defaults to "top of funnel"
- Active versus passive recruiters, and Amit's case that one of them has about a year left
- How Cleo maps who is stealing your data scientists in Hungary, and what Cliquify will not use AI for
- How your job posting got on Indeed without anyone ever posting it there
Resources & Links:
- Amit Parmar on LinkedIn
- Cliquify (also cliquify.ai — both redirect)
- People Brand Collective, where Amit is a founding board member
- James Ellis, name-checked by Desiree on employer brand
- Desiree's book, Leadership is a Practice, Not a Personality, out October 27, 2026
- Catch Talentless at RecFest USA (Nashville, Sept 23–24) and HR Tech this fall
Episode Transcript
Full conversation — searchable and screen-reader friendly
Desiree: We're back, folks. Today we're talking about how you tell a story as a recruiter — what storytelling looks like and what that means in the world we live in today, especially in the world of AI. What works, what doesn't, what makes sense.
Amit: About six years ago I had this idea that we need to be better storytellers to really engage with people at a deeper level. As you guys know, having been in the seats as recruiters — I just feel like it's become so transactional now that the human element of recruiting continues to diminish. That's what we're here to solve.
Desiree: Storytelling is kind of a buzzy word, right? It's like the buzzword we all say. What does that mean, really, to you?
Amit: It could be as simple as you take a job description and you go to the hiring manager and say, hey, what kind of leader are you? Because that's what candidates really want to know. The job is there — but the angle you take to that job is completely different, and it completely changes the trust narrative with the candidate.
Ashley: I actually think the storytelling that makes the most impact is recruiter to hiring manager — the fact of me actually selling the candidate. This actually happened to me this week. A candidate didn't pass one of the questions in my technical screen. If I was AI, I move on. But after the call, this person circled back and said “I don't know if I answered this correctly — let me reframe this.” That is an autonomous learner. That is grit. Those are the skill sets AI can't measure. That role has been open two and a half years. I just got a call from the manager: that person performed better than they've ever had another candidate perform.
